An international group of astrophysicists has applied a new method to measure one of the basic metrics of the expansion of the universe, the so-called Hubble Constant. Among the scientists involved was Kári Helgason, who has worked at the University of Iceland.
The constant in question, like the famous Hubble Telescope, is named after one of the most famous astronomers of the 20th century, Edwin Hubble. He was among the first astronomers to discover that there were many more galaxies besides our own, vast distances away, meaning that the universe was much larger than previously believed. He also demonstrated that the galaxies were getting further away from each other at a speed proportionate to the distance between them, i.e. as the distance between the galaxies grew, the faster they moved away from each other.
According to Hubble's original measurements in 1929, the speed of the expansion of the universe was about 500 km per second per megaparsec, a megaparsec being a unit of distance equivalent to about 3.26 million light-years. Hubble concluded that a galaxy that was two megaparsecs away from the Milky Way would be moving away from us at twice the speed of a galaxy that was one megaparsec away. This proportionality constant has been named the Hubble Constant and confirmed for the first time that the universe was expanding. It was also the first clue that the universe had a starting point. If the galaxies are moving away from each other, this means that they used to be closer together. If we simply rewind far enough back in time, then at one point they must have been all at a single point. The Hubble Constant is therefore a key metric of both the age of the universe and its fate. Will it continue to expand for eternity, or will it slow down and finally collapse in on itself?
Ever since the Hubble Constant was first revealed, scientists have attempted to quantify it more precisely. One of the key projects for the Hubble Space Telescope (which began operating in 1993) was to resolve the conflict between two factions of astronomers who argued about the value of the Hubble Constant, whether it was 50 or 90. In fact, neither side won that argument as the answer turned out to be somewhere in the middle, around 70.